Why? Cuz you're all on par there gear wise? Or because you play by "contained or be contained"="farm or be farmed" rule at 19?
Lovely to see ppl making excuses of playing p2p's fully loomed and enchanted chars at 20-24 just because f2p's have so many rogues and hunters that they need to counter, and the only way to counter those +1dmg weapon enchanted class is to make a DS enchanted class
) Don't tell me at 19 you don't have rogues and hunters? Seeing your subforum, you qq alot about them.
Again, i've played a lvl 24 rogue in those times when this f2p-p2p gap wasn't so gamebreaking and still i found out playing that 24 retarded OP compared to those poor f2p's. I can play that 24 again and wreck you to pieces anytime i want since my sub is active but i don't do it. why? Because that's not twinking as you call it, that's what Alpha said, stomping ants since those MANY f2ps
(that form a bracket that would not exist without them) would never be on par with you gear wise and enchantswise. You might say, ok, indeed rogues and hunters are fucking OP at 24 but only them.
Really? Have you seen a 24 disc priest dps? Have you seen a lvl24 Shadowpriest? Have you seen a 24 boomie or a 24 paladin or even a 24 lock? Yes, some of them lack the survivability of others but in terms of burst/sustained dmg, no F2P can compete with them. So again, no, not hunters and rogues broke this bracket, YOU did it in the first place.
And one more thing about hunters, tell me when it was the last time when they weren't FOTM in lower brackets? From what i remember, when i was playing at 29 in TBC, they were still Kings of the Gulch.
PS: I know, you pay for the game and you have the right do to what you want. Then, stop posting in "pros", cuz you're not. You're just a bunch of PVP failures at endgame
(see the one capping each week his Conquest Points) that like to stomp ants at lower pvp because when you meet the big boys, you can't pass the 1550 rating without being boosted, using rotation bots... etc.
