What would you change?

[Robert the Druid]

You can change one thing about World of Warcraft, big or small, but only one thing.
What would it be?

I think I would change it back so that Mounts were an accomplishment, rather than a standard of playing.
I liked it back when getting your riding skill was an accomplishment that some if not most people didn't manage until after level 60.

 

[Hashbrowns]

You can change one thing about World of Warcraft, big or small, but only one thing.
What would it be?

I think I would change it back so that Mounts were an accomplishment, rather than a standard of playing.
I liked it back when getting your riding skill was an accomplishment that some if not most people didn't manage until after level 60.

Ahh those days. I remember running around AV on my warlock with lvl 40 riding and a RL friend and his guild mate helping me rack up 1000g and us 3 manning Dire Maul to summon the epic warlock horse. (still have the mats in the bank)

 

[yasueh]

Tough one. Can't decide between Greg 'Ghostcrawler' Street ("it is the designer's job to make it fun") or Tom 'Kalgan' Chilton ("Nobody should be one-shotting at any battleground level").

And I can't say the whole dev team, because the people responsible for story/art are actually very good.

 

[Palonabanana]

Just 1 tiny thing; separating f2p and 20-24 p2p battlegrounds would benefit the game from my point of view.

 

[Srs]

No PvE gear in instanced PvP.

 

[ScatMan103]

No more heirlooms. The day heirlooms came out is the day twinking died.

 

[Goesid]

The Unshattering.

Cata removed some quests fun with storylines sure they added some but meh.

 

[Klinda]

The Hunter class has been removed from the game.

 

[Windbreaker]

No more heirlooms. The day heirlooms came out is the day twinking died.

I agree. Kill off heirlooms.

 

[Stamm]

Make realms and battlegroups of elite players who have to meet a certain standard to play in them.

 

[sevenslacks7]

You can change one thing about World of Warcraft,

Well.... here's your problem.

In seriousness though, there would be alot, but I don't think it would be incredibly complicated, which just makes it worse, because it seems in blizzards nature to just let things run themselves down, and let OBVIOUS problems go overlooked, at least when it comes to low level play.

 

[CripzBlood]

bracket for F2P only or skirmish arenas back(also for f2p only)? :/

i guess skirmish arenas.

 

[NykoEU]

Lightforge Heirloom Helm usable by f2p. I think Judgement would be too much to ask.
Preferably with inferior stats to LFH.

 

[monkeydoodoo]

rated bgs in all xp off brackets, so new players don't have to put up with more experienced players saying shit like "lol noob go get gear scrub u suck" everone starts somewhere and they don't need that.. and vice versa so more experienced players don't have to play with such players. it would also show who is actually good and who isn't as opposed to all the inflated egos around wow in general not to mention more competitive and fun bgs.

 

[monkeydoodoo]

oh and no heirlooms is a good one too, often in bgs (especially lvling bgs) its "lol I have more looms than you I win".

 

[CripzBlood]

rated bgs in all xp off brackets, so new players don't have to put up with more experienced players saying shit like "lol noob go get gear scrub u suck" everone starts somewhere and they don't need that.. and vice versa so more experienced players don't have to play with such players. it would also show who is actually good and who isn't as opposed to all the inflated egos around wow in general not to mention more competitive and fun bgs.

That would be great after making f2p only backet, we would have enough players to play agaisnt others of same rating, like 0-500, 501-1000, 1001-1500, 1501-2000, 2001-2500, 2501-3000.

Ofc there would be more pops at 1500 downer, this would get alot of premades going on.

 

[solvogero]

it used to be that greens were okay and blues were good gear. now anything less than purple is crap.

make epics epic again.

 

[Fujin0]

oh and no heirlooms is a good one too, often in bgs (especially lvling bgs) its "lol I have more looms than you I win".

I agree. Kill off heirlooms.

No more heirlooms. The day heirlooms came out is the day twinking died.

A third of my Mage's spellpower comes from the heirloom staff while 100% weapon damage on rogues and hunters usually comes from easily farmable blues.

Either you change how fucking bullshit-ly melee weapons (and Agility for Agility-users in general) works and scales and THEN you remove heirlooms, or you keep it the way it is, shit anyways but at least better than without.

 

[darkspearwow1]

im sorry but I find that a lvl 20 BoA beating any lvl 1-55 classic item in terms of spellpower is ridiculously stupid

I agree those hunter weapons need a nerf, but that 32 spellpower is utterly retarded. A heirloom scaling to level 20 should never, ever be better than lvl 55 weapons.


Its ok fujino if low level mage wont work, make a max level frost mage, you get exactly 13 CC abilities and people will complain because max level mage is op and has retarded CC plus mobility

 

[Spiriel]

it used to be that greens were okay and blues were good gear. now anything less than purple is crap.

make epics epic again.

A tale from a better time...it will never ever come back and sadly we all know that.

OT: skirmish ofc! Sold my last acc after they were removed.