if you were here for cata hunters im sure this will not be much worse.
lllllllllllllllllloooooooooooooooooooooooooooollllllllllllllllllllloooooooooolololooooooooolololololllllllllllooooooooooooooooooololoolololollllllllllololol
you have no ideal whats in store for you lol
nope. i have not tried ptr and nobody has posted anything saying/showing people having mongoose or anything... i heard it was suppose to be scaled down but everyone is just hush now.
nope. i have not tried ptr and nobody has posted anything saying/showing people having mongoose or anything... i heard it was suppose to be scaled down but everyone is just hush now.
people that are naive enough to think destroyal of BGs will increase the arena activity needs to re-think
It's not a bad idea though...
It is incredibly stupid to bunch 60 lvs together and would make more sense if they did it by every 5/10 lvs or major expansion.
I think it will tremendously hurt this bracket competitively and skillwise cause most/all of the good f2ps will leave more then likely..
So they should group enchants by:
1-60
60-70
70-80
80-85
85-90
Owai...
This is where you and I will differ... Most of my *good* games (competitive games) come from playing against some of the better P2Ps, 24s in particular (few and far between, I know). So I don't see that as a real negative. If they all ponied up and did wargames that would be even better, but meh.
However, I can muster up a care for F2P woe, balls for people that can't stomach playing but really want to still.
Anyway, I'm excited to see what the enchants do, not only to this bracket, but some of the other ones as well (10s, 39s, 60s).
you do know that if the f2ps quit this bracket will no longer exist right?
Considering this change affects all aspects of leveling, especially PvE, it's more likely that they will.as a game as a whole vs niche twink bracket with f2p, its more than likey they wont.