Does anyone miss cata?

Do you miss cata?

  • Yeah I miss it.

    Votes: 40 50.0%

  • Don't miss it at all.

    Votes: 40 50.0%
  • Total voters
    80
Agonist said:
Wrath>Vanilla>BC>Cata>MoP.

MoP is BAF, simply because of healers still healing too much. Games are long and boring and no matter how much you cc healers the efc will never die. I honestly see no balance here. Im seeing more healers than dps every game now. I srsly Cbf. Cata was awful but this is worse.
Click to expand...

Oh yes, I could tell why a hunter prefers Cata over MoP.... :)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Discover said:
Says the druid :3
Click to expand...

Naa I've been playing my warrior in MoP mostly. And if you ever FC'd as a druid in cata, you could tell it's a bit more fun FCing at the moment, when you don't get blown in a few seconds if you face more than 1 opponent solo... Obviously a hunters don't like this :)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Tried Ret in MOP. I hit a 24 shadow priest for 200 templar verdict. He crit me for 1k whenever he felt like it. I really miss ret doing actually damage.
 
A lot of people was hoping that MoP would solve all the problems in low lvl PvP, i.e. huntards, the massive burst and the weak classes like warlock and rshamans. And tbh MoP did solve all these problems, but unfortunately they created new ones aswel. I think it is hard to scale stats perfectly so there will be no burst and no immortal healers, but if Blizzards succeeds in finding the perfect balance, MoP has potential of becoming a very very good expansion.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
as a whole it's mop>>>>cata for me because all classes now have a viable spec. but they didn't balance anything, they just took the OP'nes from class A and gave it to class B
 
only reason ques are terrible right now is casue everyone is being awed by their 90s give it another month and 19s will be back to the way they where
 
Its more balanced than Cata since they took OP'nes from class A (hunters..) and gave it to both rshamans, warlocks and a bit to warriors. Though rdruids and palas with 30% speed might be OP aswel, I find it better to have 2 or 3 OP classes and no class who is really underpowered, than having hunters rule the bracket and having shamans and warlocks suffer.
 
Snack said:
Its more balanced than Cata since they took OP'nes from class A (hunters..) and gave it to both rshamans, warlocks and a bit to warriors. Though rdruids and palas with 30% speed might be OP aswel, I find it better to have 2 or 3 OP classes and no class who is really underpowered, than having hunters rule the bracket and having shamans and warlocks suffer.
Click to expand...

that isn't balance, that's a shift of power. and i'd rather face a cata hunter than a mop bdruid....
 
Last edited by a moderator:
love ppl complaining about balance druids having too much dmg when its their offhealing and mobility making them stronger than the cata hunter
 
Hurrx said:
how exactly did a hunter burst for 2000 damage? are you talking about some kinda 10-sec-"burst" or what?
Click to expand...


ex·ag·ger·ate(
ibreve.gif
g-z
abreve.gif
j
prime.gif
schwa.gif
-r
amacr.gif
t
lprime.gif
)v. ex·ag·ger·at·ed, ex·ag·ger·at·ing, ex·ag·ger·ates
v.tr.1. To represent as greater than is actually the case; overstate: exaggerate the size of the enemy force; exaggerated his own role in the episode.
2. To enlarge or increase to an abnormal degree: thick lenses that exaggerated the size of her eyes.

v.intr.To make overstatements.
 
had some fun times in cata, even tho we complained alot and told eachother how shit 19s were..we were still queuein fo' hours and had a fuckin blast
i kinda miss it to some point eu
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 3 (members: 0, guests: 3)
Top