Is Kang still viable?

I have a 48 Warrior that I started trying to twink over 2 years ago - and just left him neglected in the corner. However, I did buy and equip Kang, but I'm not seeing many builds out there that still use it. Thoughts?
 
sure its viable....



but its not the best. executioners cleaver or the BoA axe are better axes for sure.



and i've been messing on my warrior with mace spec + ragehammer, and sword spec + stoneslayer; just got bored of the cookie cutter arms for a bit.
 
It's still good, but there are better (and there's always been).



[item]Executioner's Cleaver[/item]

[item]Bloodied Arcanite Reaper[/item]



Reaper at 49:

139-209

3.8

46 DPS

16 STR

24 STA

16 Crit Rating (1.45% at 49)
 
the proc sucks. it's too low to justify having and would only be worth while against a rogue, but odds are it wont proc + if you're arms and not using rend you fail. hard.



if you have a lvl 80, farm badges for the BoA axe. if not scour the AH for a reasonably priced executioners cleaver. if you want to be off beat, farm the last boss in ulda for his mace/sword and have fun!
 
ribsplitter (of the bear/tiger/monkey/strength/etc.) + doomforged straightedge.



or ribsplitter + ribsplitter



or bloodrazor + ribsplitter



but thats for fury, DW arms just suckssssss, and when i say sucks i mean it sucks more than fury itself.
 
Is it just me or is Fury the "funnest" spec? I haven't been fury since well before wrath, but it was a lot of fun then. Sure it's damn near impossible to kill rogues, but I just enjoyed the hell out of it. It's the only build where you always have rage....discuss?
 
sure you usually always have rage. but i dont find it fun, and ive play warrior since vanilla. i've always prefer'd arms, and with LK i like prot a lot too. the tree has been changed so much in the years, adding an ms effect, constantly messing with death wish/imp intercept, etc. but i still just dont like it =/
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top