HéalBǿt
Legend
there are really only two accepted tactics in “intellectually honest” debate.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intellectual_honesty
1. demonstrating errors or omissions in facts.
2. demonstrating errors or omissions in logic.
the list of intellectually dishonest tactics is much longer, so i’ll just refer to the below wiki on fallacy, which comes with cool latin phrases such as “post hoc ergo propter hoc”.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fallacy
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intellectual_honesty
1. demonstrating errors or omissions in facts.
2. demonstrating errors or omissions in logic.
the list of intellectually dishonest tactics is much longer, so i’ll just refer to the below wiki on fallacy, which comes with cool latin phrases such as “post hoc ergo propter hoc”.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fallacy
