I have taken a look at ICC + RS 25 HC vs Cata and i only use neck cloak belt hands 1ring 1 trinket + weapon as cata.
So mainly for fire PVE i have more woltk gear then cata.
So you've picked the spec that you basically use more wotlk gear than cata gear because that's a spec that dislikes mastery? Shocking. I bet you're still grasping hold of that precious 284 sword as well.
Iam just wondering why do we twink if we aren't in the past, and yeh why would you dont do ICC 25 HC / RS 25 HC with only woltk stuff to make it a challnge.
I'm going to address your entire post separately, just to avoid confusing you. Making it a challenge is fine, but finding 24 other people willing to go for that same challenge is really not possible, especially in this bracket. It's possible in 70s sure, but even then you might get 1-2% interest out of the whole community. Not exactly much.
Alot of ICC 25 HC + RS 25 HC gear is BIS for many classes, loads of items.
Holy fuck, where exactly did I say that FULL cata gear was BiS? I've never said that, stop acting like I did.
So why should you no't do icc 25hc /rs 25 hc with only icc gear / rs gear and enchants proffs pots flaks, just becuase it exsist cata stuff so you NEED to use it? makes no sense.
Because it's better. I fail to see how artificially gimping yourself because you want to use inferior epics rather than the cataclysm blues. There's honestly no reward for doing ICC this way, and given that despite Aelobin's best efforts, we couldn't even clear ICC with a full 80s group. Go ahead and use the wotlk in 85 pugs, since you barely do anything there anyway (unless you're a healer) it doesn't even matter.
God i hate when people say we aren't in the past it makes no sense if you twink. ( my personal opinion)
Then, in my personal opinion, you're wrong. And because of that, we're going to disagree. If you want to wear full wotlk gear, go play a private server. On live, it isn't best in slot, sorry. Trying to poke at me because I think you're stupid for gimping yourself isn't going to make your point any more valid I'm afraid.