39 arms warrior

[Itwinkrogues]

hey guys,

just wanted to hear your opinion on if i should go for it and make one or if they are just a waste of gold.

Thanks

 

[Falkor]

waste of gold. fury is the weakest warrior spec on the planet; BUT if you really wanna mess with fury go at LEAST 49 where you can get bloodthirst and other key talents. the high up you go the better if becomes to with titans grip, etc. but yea...its always weaker than arms for pvp, and even prot kicks ass now

 

[Samsom]

isnt he asking about arms instead of fury ?

 

[Situation]

Depending on how well geared / played they are, warriors are still pretty effective in arenas or BGs. The only drawback is they are more reliant on backup healing and support than, say, a ret paladin or rogue. Prot and Arms are two distinctly different specs that can offer some interesting variation in game play as well. I don't think any class you enjoy or interests you would be a waste of gold in my mind.

 

[Magnusopus]

waste of gold. fury is the weakest warrior spec on the planet; BUT if you really wanna mess with fury go at LEAST 49 where you can get bloodthirst and other key talents. the high up you go the better if becomes to with titans grip, etc. but yea...its always weaker than arms for pvp, and even prot kicks ass now

OP is totally talking about arms.





Arms has some solid damage, but just like another poster said they are pretty reliant on outside help.



With a good healer backing them up that can keep snares off of them, and keep them up, an arms warrior can mainline damage into the asshole of any target with the best of em.



So my suggestion would be to go for the arms warrior if you like that play style and you're willing to work hard at it AND if you have a healer. Otherwise rogues and paladins do much better solo.