Restrictions and balance

Allybeboba

Legend
Here is your thread.
Discuss at your leisure [MENTION=14809]Lanky[/MENTION]. Please leave [MENTION=17546]Crystalpall[/MENTION]'s thread in peace.


And I told you how many times now? three times? That i'm making my observation, you just see it as an insult.



If there's anyone missisng anything it's you. Was answering a simple question really that hard? Since you are still missing it i'll put the key words in bold, " "let me ask you, how does veterans having the same restrictions as trials have anything to do with ingame imbalance?? "


Restrictions have absolutely nothing to do with imbalance at any level End game or otherwise.
I have stated this three times. And I can't count how many times in the past.

/cheers
 
Here is your thread.
Discuss at your leisure [MENTION=14809]Lanky[/MENTION]. Please leave [MENTION=17546]Crystalpall[/MENTION]'s thread in peace.


Restrictions have absolutely nothing to do with imbalance at any level End game or otherwise.
I have stated this three times. And I can't count how many times in the past.

/cheers

Ok thats what I was looking for, restrictions have nothing to do with pvp imbalance, this means we can finally conclude that 20 vets are closer to 29s than f2ps. Just because vets are restricted similar to f2ps doesn't mean they fall in the same category as f2ps in-game due to enchants
 
Ok thats what I was looking for, restrictions have nothing to do with pvp imbalance, this means we can finally conclude that 20 vets are closer to 29s than f2ps. Just because vets are restricted similar to f2ps doesn't mean they fall in the same category as f2ps in-game due to enchants

No, over all veterans are closer to trials.
As I stated in the other thread. With very few exceptions, Veterans have the same restrictions that Trial accounts have. And they do... Neither can do pet battles, neither can trade, neither can purchase items off the AH, neither can form groups, neither can create high end proffesion items, the list goes on and on. A subbed account can do all of these. And all of these are in game. And they effect the enjoyment of the game for many people. Perhaps not for you.
You can look at the thread that all of this mess started in. There are many many people that value collecting pets, doing achievements, etc myself included. There is much more to the game besides WSG.
Think outside the box... Set your mind free. Be a leader, not a follower.

/cheers
 
No, over all veterans are closer to trials.
As I stated in the other thread. With very few exceptions, Veterans have the same restrictions that Trial accounts have. And they do... Neither can do pet battles, neither can trade, neither can purchase items off the AH, neither can form groups, neither can create high end proffesion items, the list goes on and on. A subbed account can do all of these. And all of these are in game. And they effect the enjoyment of the game for many people. Perhaps not for you.
You can look at the thread that all of this mess started in. There are many many people that value collecting pets, doing achievements, etc myself included. There is much more to the game besides WSG.
Think outside the box... Set your mind free. Be a leader, not a follower.

/cheers

And I said, in the previous thread, that I am talking about WSG and arena. My first post in that thread was infact "not in wsg" yet you continued to say vets are more similar to f2ps eventhough I made it crystal clear that I was talking about WSG and arena, so all that you've listed is irrelevant to my argument
 
F2ps are not vets, vets are not f2ps. F2ps don't use enchants unlike vets. Being a vet gets you very close to 29's except for some gear and spells. Just stop this stupid arguement about vets being closer to f2ps than to 29's because that pure bs. Vets and f2ps are 2 very different things.
 
Veterans have esentially the same stats as 29s, just a few less spells

A vet can easily win against a 29, but the gap between vet and f2p is massive.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top