windalker vs brewmaster

more viable spec


  • Total voters
    11

Neon

Trying pure f2p
Ww pros:
aoe stun
Flying tiger kick good for fcing off tot and an unreliable slow
Mediocre damage outside of fists of fury and ele force procs

Brewmaster pros:
Aoe instant slows that use no resources
High burst on 6 sec cd that is aoe and a slow to
Has consistent dmg with free tiger palms
Is really durable and a viable fc

Ww cons :
Fof is unreliable and can be trinketed
Squishy feel like an mop arms warrior

Brewmaster cons :
Harder to gear
Is missing the bubble that makes them overpowered

I personally feel bm has more gamechanging abilities than Ww in bgs and has a bigger toolkit.

However Ww shines in an arena setting.

What is public opinion on the better veteran spec.
 
more viable spec?

WW is more likely to land a kill on a healer than Brewmaster. That's the only advantage. Brewmaster has everything else.

If it wasn't for the FOTM train I'd probably play Brewmaster as a Vet. I enjoyed playing it back when the bracket was only 20-24 and I enjoyed how much control I had over the other team as brewmaster. Keep the entire team slowed with Dizzyhaze and Dot spread. Offheal spam between each keg smash. I felt like the ultimate support class.

Brewmaster has immense amount of control that so many FOTM hunter re-rollers are not utilizing. I kind of wish they would nerf Kegsmash to the ground like that did with Prot Warrior's Shield slam. Could care less if 29 brewmasters have their 6k bubble as long as kegsmash does little-to-no damage.

/sigh
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top