windalker vs brewmaster

more viable spec


  • Total voters
    11

Neon

Fuck on me
  • Ww pros:
    aoe stun
    Flying tiger kick good for fcing off tot and an unreliable slow
    Mediocre damage outside of fists of fury and ele force procs

    Brewmaster pros:
    Aoe instant slows that use no resources
    High burst on 6 sec cd that is aoe and a slow to
    Has consistent dmg with free tiger palms
    Is really durable and a viable fc

    Ww cons :
    Fof is unreliable and can be trinketed
    Squishy feel like an mop arms warrior

    Brewmaster cons :
    Harder to gear
    Is missing the bubble that makes them overpowered

    I personally feel bm has more gamechanging abilities than Ww in bgs and has a bigger toolkit.

    However Ww shines in an arena setting.

    What is public opinion on the better veteran spec.
     
    more viable spec?

    WW is more likely to land a kill on a healer than Brewmaster. That's the only advantage. Brewmaster has everything else.

    If it wasn't for the FOTM train I'd probably play Brewmaster as a Vet. I enjoyed playing it back when the bracket was only 20-24 and I enjoyed how much control I had over the other team as brewmaster. Keep the entire team slowed with Dizzyhaze and Dot spread. Offheal spam between each keg smash. I felt like the ultimate support class.

    Brewmaster has immense amount of control that so many FOTM hunter re-rollers are not utilizing. I kind of wish they would nerf Kegsmash to the ground like that did with Prot Warrior's Shield slam. Could care less if 29 brewmasters have their 6k bubble as long as kegsmash does little-to-no damage.

    /sigh
     

    Users who are viewing this thread

    Top