Fire mages?

I want to hear opinions on them..
Do they have potent at 70?


I duel in fire all the time. Any class you can get the opener on and them without a trinket = you win.

Poly > Dispel > Frostjaw > Pyro > DF > IB > Pyro > Ice Lance = dead

Besides that, you're survivability is low and burst is pretty dependant on casts.

Tl;dr loads of potential, hard to master
 
Used to play mine lots, but you're basicly a frostmage with pyroblast now, hoping wod will bring back some fire spells. Still viable I believe, havnt played mine much this expansion besides occasionally messing around, frost is still stronger but you have the burst potential to kill people
 
Used to play mine lots, but you're basicly a frostmage with pyroblast now, hoping wod will bring back some fire spells. Still viable I believe, havnt played mine much this expansion besides occasionally messing around, frost is still stronger but you have the burst potential to kill people

Fire is nothing like playing frost with a pyro.
Less freezes, even snares and with frost, using your Frozen Orb is guaranteed burst with FoF, getting crits with a scorch isn't never going to be definite, meaning kill windows are much smaller.
Fire is very hard vs classes that have a freedom like rets. No shatter = low burst.
 
Fire is nothing like playing frost with a pyro.
Less freezes, even snares and with frost, using your Frozen Orb is guaranteed burst with FoF, getting crits with a scorch isn't never going to be definite, meaning kill windows are much smaller.
Fire is very hard vs classes that have a freedom like rets. No shatter = low burst.


Thanks for summarizing everything. Ive always been more of a fan of fire but didn't know if it was viable @ 70.
 
Fire is nothing like playing frost with a pyro.
Less freezes, even snares and with frost, using your Frozen Orb is guaranteed burst with FoF, getting crits with a scorch isn't never going to be definite, meaning kill windows are much smaller.
Fire is very hard vs classes that have a freedom like rets. No shatter = low burst.

No combust, living bomb. Now has deep and shatter, very big change from how it was when I started playing mine in cata, basicly a frostmage 2.0 compared to then
 
No combust, living bomb. Now has deep and shatter, very big change from how it was when I started playing mine in cata, basicly a frostmage 2.0 compared to then

I'm also assuming you would class an Arcane Mage as a Frost Mage v3.0, interesting.
 
it doesnt feel like fire without living bomb and combustion but it also doesnt feel like a frostmage ( burstmacro and spam lances = gg)
atleast you have scorch/pyro/dragons breath
 
it doesnt feel like fire without living bomb and combustion but it also doesnt feel like a frostmage ( burstmacro and spam lances = gg)
atleast you have scorch/pyro/dragons breath

I agree that when we did have LB we were a lot more effective.

Remember the good old days when you would cast Pyro (DoT), insta Pyro (DoT), LB and Ignite into 3-4k combustion ticks whilst you sat in a block haha. Even farmed that trinket for chance on dot 330 damage or something <3
 
I'm also assuming you would class an Arcane Mage as a Frost Mage v3.0, interesting.

Is to me, the speccs lost too much diversity, I never liked frost much, now you have the same playstyle in the other speccs with burst revolving around deep / shatter
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top