Would you prefer a p2p bracket separate from a f2p bracket?

(See thread title)

  • Yes. I like fighting other p2p's.

    Votes: 10 25.6%
  • Yes, but I would switch to f2p if the brackets split.

    Votes: 12 30.8%
  • No, I like having an unfair advantage.

    Votes: 17 43.6%

  • Total voters
    39

Stamm

Legend
I'm curious of the opinions of the matter here. I have my own thoughts, but that's not the point of this thread.
 
silly thread, going to get ridden with troll post's and troll answers. u will get ur p2p gimps pretending there cool saying they would go p2p or play for a challenge. and ur trolls saying they like killing f2p scrubs, leading to arguments xD also the poll options aren't great...
 
I'd rather it stay the way it is but only allow 2 of each class in via queue system. Too many of any class is more op than the chants they wear.
 
Is this poll meant to be taken seriously? The options put words in voters' mouths.
 
why would a f2p make a poll in a p2p 20-24 forum to begin with just comes out trollish.

about the same effect as a 24 posting in F2P threads then. NOthing new.

OnT: Yes would love the separation as I play F2P restricted. And the rofl of the 24 queue times, would just be icing on the cake ;)
 
Do you have any better suggestions for what I could have put as poll options?

open the pole so we can see who voted for what. i'm betting the ones who clicked the 3rd option are f2p's.

i'll tell you my opinion because your poll is bias.

in every bracket i've played since tbc, my opponent has had the same gear/chants as i can obtain. so someone being on equal ground to me wouldn't bother me in the slightest. i play this bracket because of the Q times, no more, no less.

if any other twink bracket had these Q times, i'd be gone in a second.

edit: what i would be annoyed at if the bracket split, is blizzard doing it for f2ps, when p2ps as been asking for it for years (in other brackets).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
If you just play this bracket cause of queue times why not make a f2p restricted char? You can get all the gear on p2p acc if you cba to get it the f2p way but still want competitve gameplay
 
Last edited by a moderator:
If you just play this bracket cause of queue times why not make a f2p restricted char? You can get all the gear on p2p acc if you cba to get it the f2p way but still want competitve gameplay

i do play f2p characters. i just happen to have both. like your self and alot of others.
 
open the pole so we can see who voted for what. i'm betting the ones who clicked the 3rd option are f2p's.

i'll tell you my opinion because your poll is bias.

in every bracket i've played since tbc, my opponent has had the same gear/chants as i can obtain. so someone being on equal ground to me wouldn't bother me in the slightest. i play this bracket because of the Q times, no more, no less.

if any other twink bracket had these Q times, i'd be gone in a second.

edit: what i would be annoyed at if the bracket split, is blizzard doing it for f2ps, when p2ps as been asking for it for years (in other brackets).

Jk farming grey in TBC.
 
Seems like your passive-aggressive point was given.

By definition, if nothing more, p2p's have an unfair advantage should they choose not to go by f2p restrictions. There isn't a plausible reason (that isn't terribly far-fetched) to select no unless one likes having an unfair advantage, and I will stand by that statement until someone gives me reason to consider otherwise.
 
By definition, if nothing more, p2p's have an unfair advantage should they choose not to go by f2p restrictions. There isn't a plausible reason (that isn't terribly far-fetched) to select no unless one likes having an unfair advantage, and I will stand by that statement until someone gives me reason to consider otherwise.

and by this logic, the thread currently running in the f2p section, the one in my sig, and the one from last week, im gonna have to stand by my opinion that f2ps are p2p wannabes that cant afford it. stereotypes are a bitch, no?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top