yeah.. "best of 19s"
I like to take into consideration peoples' ability on their main because I think 90 PVP takes a lot more skill than 19 PVP. That's why I chose people like Nettie, Mtv, Auggey... I've witnessed them play at the 2k+ arena level which speaks volume on their overall skill. Unfortunately there are lots of 19s who have never played competitively on their 90's, and far too many who can't even break 1750... yet they still appear in the "best of" lists... but that's just me.
Ciren has always been #1 .
im 2k+ and not on any of these..even tho im prolly not known to most
edit ciren is better than me atm tho, behind him I'm the best rogue ive seen based on dmg, positioning, clutch returns, 1v1, and recovering from over extending
Zeddxo aka revolution is the best of US. He carried my new 90 to 18k conquest cap.
![]()
I like to take into consideration peoples' ability on their main because I think 90 PVP takes a lot more skill than 19 PVP. That's why I chose people like Nettie, Mtv, Auggey... I've witnessed them play at the 2k+ arena level which speaks volume on their overall skill. Unfortunately there are lots of 19s who have never played competitively on their 90's, and far too many who can't even break 1750... yet they still appear in the "best of" lists... but that's just me.
anyone who can play one class good at 19 can play every class good at 19
#fact
except stubsanyone who can play one class good at 19 can play every class good at 19
#fact
the thread is called "best of 19s", not "who is the best at playing 19s." In my interpretation, the thread is asking who, of the players in the 19 community, is the best. I like to factor in peoples' skill at 90 when I consider them as one of the best players in our community...
let me try to clarify with an example. it's like asking "who is the best athlete" in a baseball league's forum. you can answer the question based on how good that person is at baseball, sure, but I'm also going to consider how good they are at football, soccer, hockey etc... because I think baseball, by itself, doesn't tell much about someones athletic ability. thus, for a more accurate answer, I reference other sports for better information. in this example, baseball is the 19 bracket, and other sports represent the 90 bracket.
NOW, if the question was "who is the best baseball player", then i would not factor in those other sports. such is the difference between a "who is the best of the 19s" thread and "who is the best at playing 19s". In the end, it is really up to your own interpretation of what "best of 19s" means. As I stated above, I think it means "who, of the players in the 19 community, is the best", and I think being the "best" encompasses more than ability on a level 19, hence why I first responded in such a way to Giliese's initial question of "what do you consider when writing the lists". Hope that makes sense.
aight drugs if I edit the OP will you stop with this nonsense?
All hail the magic conch.