Any other classes worthy of being good, but NOT overplayed, for healing?
Lieesssss!Druids are the weakest healers at this lvl just like there 85 counterparts. Honestly, any other healer would be better but unless you want to be a good fc, don't pick a druid
Lieesssss!
They're just different. If you want to play a class that sits still and heal things, it's true that sham/priest/pally can probably do it better. But when you want to keep up with a mobile fc, switch quickly between bases in ab, kite things.... resto is the way to go. No other healer has the same mobility, and if you're an ansty bugger like me who likes to move around resto druids are great.
You'r Thaktii right? Seen yeh in bgs. Yeh seem to stress about the mid idiots.
Probably because 1 player is enough to get him down. Getting 3 brainless people to attack the same target is a lot harder and it seems that needs some coordination ie. "FFS, kill the Hpal."A real advantage to resto druids is they tend to die less than other healers. I have never once in a bg heard "FFS, kill the resto druid".
Druids are fine. But they are more about assistance, instead of straight up healing like Paladins.I guess I really need to group with Olé at some point to see it for myself. In my experience, I just don't see Druids having the healing output to keep someone alive through the dps even a single Hunter puts out not even considering considering the burst. Priests have the bubble, which is insanely useful on FCs and squishy targets. hPally have insane FoL heals coupled with Holy Shock for crazy burst healing. Shaman has Earth Shield which generally provides enough time to keep a target up. On my Warrior rDruids go down in like 2 global cooldowns and cannot get away because of Piercing Howl.
Alright, you're right, if the druid goes bear form and kites me with thorns, I die.