80 section drama - 16th jan 2012

Status
Not open for further replies.

Aelobin

DK Twink (80 / 85 / 101)
I do not claim any credit for both above answers.



First of all, let me just make it clear: I'm not making this post in an attempt to start anymore drama. I have an opinion that I would like to be heard by those who it concerns, that is all.



I'm pretty sure everyone who visits the 80-84 section regularly will know that it isn't as active as many of us would like, especially in comparison to the other twinking brackets. However, we still seem to pull together with the few people who do post here in the hope of maintaining what could be a growing community. The reason I use the word "could" is because of two issues I'd like to address.



The first is what happened this evening. I won't deny that this forum was in a bit of chaos with a tipsy Scotsman let loose across it (who was an officer of my guild Legacy back in our 80 raiding days). That being said, it's the most active (and probably entertaining) that this section has been in quite a while. Sure, he (and possibly one or two others) may have overstepped the line a bit and thus those posts were deleted to maintain order, but there were some genuine posts amongst the "fun" that were deleted also. It wasn't that which bothered me so much though, more the permanent bans that were given to both him and another guild member of mine (who was just casually posting in response to him).



Which brings me to the quoted line above this wall of text. If a user is putting his own time and effort into helping out others on this forum, and such contributions are so valuable that you take the time to repost them, then what does that show for the future of this community? If the helpful people end up being banned for a mere night of silly back and forth, that's going to do nothing but reduce the quantity and quality of posts in this section. Correct me if I'm wrong, but neither user had any "warn status" or whatever you call the infraction system here, yet they were immediately given permanent bans.



The second issue I wanted to raise was just about the general moderation of this section. It feels like all the flaming and insults are tolerated here, that is until it the "Community Leader" comes into the line of fire. I'm referring mainly to the poster who got banned last night in the UI thread (I didn't know him personally) who was simply asking you a question, Nesyla. Yes, he could have been a bit more polite in how he asked it (and responded thereafter), but at the same time I'd say the majority of posts made here contain a similiar attitude and are never touched. If you're going to attempt to justify banning a member with over 2000 posts, can you at least uphold some sort of consistency with the moderation? I know I'm not perfect and I know some people have their own ways of expressing themselves, but it feels unfair that action is rarely taken unless it is something aimed specifically at you.



Obviously this is off-topic and I'm guessing that commenting on moderator action is frowned upon, so if you want to go ahead and delete this post once you (and Kore) have read it then I'll stay quiet about it from then onwards.
 
First of all, let me just make it clear: I'm not making this post in an attempt to start anymore drama. I have an opinion that I would like to be heard by those who it concerns, that is all.



I'm pretty sure everyone who visits the 80-84 section regularly will know that it isn't as active as many of us would like, especially in comparison to the other twinking brackets. However, we still seem to pull together with the few people who do post here in the hope of maintaining what could be a growing community. The reason I use the word "could" is because of two issues I'd like to address.



The first is what happened this evening. I won't deny that this forum was in a bit of chaos with a tipsy Scotsman let loose across it (who was an officer of my guild Legacy back in our 80 raiding days). That being said, it's the most active (and probably entertaining) that this section has been in quite a while. Sure, he (and possibly one or two others) may have overstepped the line a bit and thus those posts were deleted to maintain order, but there were some genuine posts amongst the "fun" that were deleted also. It wasn't that which bothered me so much though, more the permanent bans that were given to both him and another guild member of mine (who was just casually posting in response to him).



Which brings me to the quoted line above this wall of text. If a user is putting his own time and effort into helping out others on this forum, and such contributions are so valuable that you take the time to repost them, then what does that show for the future of this community? If the helpful people end up being banned for a mere night of silly back and forth, that's going to do nothing but reduce the quantity and quality of posts in this section. Correct me if I'm wrong, but neither user had any "warn status" or whatever you call the infraction system here, yet they were immediately given permanent bans.



The second issue I wanted to raise was just about the general moderation of this section. It feels like all the flaming and insults are tolerated here, that is until it the "Community Leader" comes into the line of fire. I'm referring mainly to the poster who got banned last night in the UI thread (I didn't know him personally) who was simply asking you a question, Nesyla. Yes, he could have been a bit more polite in how he asked it (and responded thereafter), but at the same time I'd say the majority of posts made here contain a similiar attitude and are never touched. If you're going to attempt to justify banning a member with over 2000 posts, can you at least uphold some sort of consistency with the moderation? I know I'm not perfect and I know some people have their own ways of expressing themselves, but it feels unfair that action is rarely taken unless it is something aimed specifically at you.



Obviously this is off-topic and I'm guessing that commenting on moderator action is frowned upon, so if you want to go ahead and delete this post once you (and Kore) have read it then I'll stay quiet about it from then onwards.



Right, let me get this straight from the beginning and if my tone might sound a bit irritated ignore it.

There is a difference betwen bringing activity and considering these forums as your own personal playground, the way both your ex guild members was absolutely wrong, they started from the prospective of having the right to say, write and post whar and wherever they wanted, this is a pulic forum on a website that aims to be a mature, polite and information tool for both developement and general knowledge about the Twink World, try to think about what happened tonight being a normal average user who perhaps just logs once a day to stay updated on guilds and community plans to improve the in-game fun by organizing various events, do you genuinly think that you would have apreciated the spam that i personally had to clean up tonight ? Or would have you rather saw it as a denigratory act to this whole community ?



About 160 posts where created, this is a huge ammount to clean up, i went thru every single one of them and i can assure you that the only notable post was the two i saved and posted as response in this thread. If an user is putting his own time and effort into helping out people he should be enought mature to understand that spamming 158 ( two where positive ) will most likely get him a permanent ban, there is no reason why this community should accept 158 spam posts for two positive ones, if it was the other way around i could partially agree with you, but it was not.



Here is a direct link to Twink Info CoC, as you can see by yourself every post found being in direct disagreement can and will be considered as a violation, 158 spam posts add so many " warning points " that the account results into a permament ban. I would as well like to quote a specific part from the botton part :



  • We reserve the right to disable or action against any account at any time for any reason and without notice.
  • Any abuse towards our staff and/or management in any form will not be tolerated.



Please be aware that i have no ban " hammer " and that my powers are very limited, my job is to help the Moderators and the Administrators who are busy with several issues and do not have the time to go thru reach thread, this is what we Community Leaders try to do at our best.



No sort of insult or flaming is tollerated, if you see posts including such terms you have a report button and your higly encouraged to use it, yes it's mainly our job to do that, but we are human and we still might miss some, i can guarantee you that any kind of report is being equally valued and that a report done by a Community Leader is not considered more than a Member's report, both are considered the same way and dealt with as soon as humanly possible.

Your tone here seems to have taken a bit of a more personal direction, please do not misunderstand me, but you are in fact not aware on that poster's history and you do not know the ammount of warnings that his account had, the fact of me being taken into the " line of fire " did not have any kind of impact on the decision, it would have been dealt the same way if any other member had been " targeted " .



I really dont see an sort of specific cible above my head, and most members are starting to finally apreciate our daily effort to keep the forums clean as they are ment to be.



Discussing Disciplinary Actions

​

This category includes :
  • Creating posts or threads to discuss disciplinary actions taken against any account, thread or other parts of the forum.

If a member is found to have participated in such actions, he/she will :
  • Be given an appropriate number of infraction points or a temporary/extended ban from the forums, depending upon severity

If you wish to dispute disciplinary action taken against you you should directly contact any staff member through the Private Message system on the account in question.



I wanted to make a thread to clarify the situation and prevent such questions as yours Feaire, but it was decided not to.



I will not delete your questions, as i tried to answer to each one of them at my best, i understand your thoughts and i tried to clarify them. This is not ment to be taken as a reason to derail this thread further.



If your questions, and my answers seem to be a reason why this thread derails i will be removing them. I would just like to add that judging this whole situation from an objective point of view is not very easy considering that you have been a guild member of both banned accounts, but try to understand that we are not here to make these forums a dictatorship, but a better place.



- Nesyla
 
I respect your decision to respond to my post (and in great detail) rather than taking the easier option which would have been to "hide it under the rug".



Right, let me get this straight from the beginning and if my tone might sound a bit irritated ignore it.

No worries, it's been a rather eventful evening.



There is a difference betwen bringing activity and considering these forums as your own personal playground, the way both your ex guild members was absolutely wrong, they started from the prospective of having the right to say, write and post whar and wherever they wanted

I am not disagreeing with you on that point, (most) the behaviour was out of line. I'd just like to point out though, out of the 2 guild members who were banned the one who made the most "disruptive" posts was also the one who was tipsy. I know that doesn't excuse his actions, and there was no way for you to know what state he was in, but I don't feel it warrants the banning of the other guild member who was merely replying to him as a friend. The other member being the one who has been fairly active in this section at select points in time, helping people and such.



this is a pulic forum on a website that aims to be a mature, polite and information tool for both developement and general knowledge about the Twink World,

That's what I'd hope it aims to be, but it feels like it's far from a reality from what I've seen over the time I've been an 80 twink. I was deterred away from this forum for a considerable amount of time as I felt all I ever got in response to polite respectful posting was hate, trolling, and sheer bragging. I know you personally can't be held accountable for that, but I just wanted to give you an insight into my perspective.



try to think about what happened tonight being a normal average user who perhaps just logs once a day to stay updated on guilds and community plans to improve the in-game fun by organizing various events, do you genuinly think that you would have apreciated the spam that i personally had to clean up tonight ? Or would have you rather saw it as a denigratory act to this whole community ?

I can understand how it would have had a negative impact on the average user's experience, yes. Maybe if it hadn't been on such a large scale my opinion would have been different though due to how quiet this section of TI can be, which is the point I was trying to make before.



About 160 posts where created, this is a huge ammount to clean up, i went thru every single one of them and i can assure you that the only notable post was the two i saved and posted as response in this thread.

I know my opinion isn't really worth much, but I'm afraid this is the part where we're going to have to agree to disagree. I was keeping track of most the new posts being made throughout the evening, and most the "useless" conversations were kept within a new thread and maybe 1-2 other threads. I'm grateful for your efforts you put into moderating the forum, but I also saw many genuine contributions to threads, some of which were being deleted and reposted multiple times (which probably made up a fair number of that 160 count).



If an user is putting his own time and effort into helping out people he should be enought mature to understand that spamming 158 ( two where positive ) will most likely get him a permanent ban, there is no reason why this community should accept 158 spam posts for two positive ones, if it was the other way around i could partially agree with you, but it was not.

I'm guessing the 158 posts was a combined total of "spam" posts, the majority of which were not made by the poster who made the above 2 valuable posts. With regards to the permanent ban, I think that's a little extreme for a first-time offense, but maybe that's just me. By no means am I suggesting nothing should have been done, but don't you guys hand out temporary bans around here and give people the chance to redeem themselves after it expires? At least if they've been a member for quite a while.



Nesyla' timestamp='1326769493' post='411872 said:
Please be aware that i have no ban " hammer " and that my powers are very limited, my job is to help the Moderators and the Administrators who are busy with several issues and do not have the time to go thru reach thread, this is what we Community Leaders try to do at our best.

I'm curious as to whether you attempted to contact the 2 users via PM before deleting the real contributions they made both tonight and in the past, and requesting action from a mod/admin. I have a feeling a nice push in the right direction would often solve these problems without the community losing a member or two.



Nesyla' timestamp='1326769493' post='411872 said:
No sort of insult or flaming is tollerated, if you see posts including such terms you have a report button and your higly encouraged to use it, yes it's mainly our job to do that, but we are human and we still might miss some, i can guarantee you that any kind of report is being equally valued and that a report done by a Community Leader is not considered more than a Member's report, both are considered the same way and dealt with as soon as humanly possible.

Thanks for the advice, I'll be sure to get some use out of that button should it be needed. I just hope the 80-84 forum doesn't become what it was before (and what it feels like it could be leading to recently), otherwise I'd find myself clicking it on a large portion of posts and wondering whether it was worth being here in the first place.



Nesyla' timestamp='1326769493' post='411872 said:
Your tone here seems to have taken a bit of a more personal direction, please do not misunderstand me, but you are in fact not aware on that poster's history and you do not know the ammount of warnings that his account had, the fact of me being taken into the " line of fire " did not have any kind of impact on the decision, it would have been dealt the same way if any other member had been " targeted " .

Fair enough. The reason I suspected such treatment was it's the first time I've seen a mod/admin being called upon in this section (although I'll admit I did take a break for quite a while, like I explained above).



Nesyla' timestamp='1326769493' post='411872 said:
If your questions, and my answers seem to be a reason why this thread derails i will be removing them. I would just like to add that judging this whole situation from an objective point of view is not very easy considering that you have been a guild member of both banned accounts, but try to understand that we are not here to make these forums a dictatorship, but a better place.

I know there's a different point of view to consider, but hopefully you can also understand that we're all human, even if some of us act a little crazy at times for whatever reasons. Everything I've written in this post pretty much concludes my questions/responses, so feel free to delete this and the other posts now you've finished reading it.
 
I'll have to admit, if it wasn't for the DK soloing thread, I'd barely be in this forum at all. The 70s forum is similar of late, filled with pointlessness that I figure results from some of the "legacy" members (in terms of time spent, not guild
<
) having simply moved on from the bracket, leaving the remains to the newcomers, who don't really understand much (Satiná's BiS posts, how I wish I had saved them, it was the single most useful part of the forum and nobody can come close to it now, not to mention the assistance I've given (among others) has been all but ignored). The 80s bracket is in a worse state, mainly because of two things (in my opinion at least); 1. The lack of knowledge (the threads that provide it aren't extensive, mainly due to the point in question), and 2. Inactivity/trolling. The UI thread was a decent example.



Agreeing with Feaire, whilst yesterday was a bit over the top (so to speak), I'm not sure such heavy punishments should have been placed on the two members (Especially since one of them was barely spamming at all, little more contribution than I had), considering that they (were) some of the more knowledgeable members who contribute to the 80s bracket.



Just my thoughts.
 
Chardev



I do not claim any credit for both above answers.



As the creator of the post, may i ask that you delete the entire post as i beleive that it should no longer be here, or at least give credit instead of saying you do not take credit in the post as there was no need to delete the post and remake them as your own. Thanks.
 
As the creator of the post, may i ask that you delete the entire post as i beleive that it should no longer be here, or at least give credit instead of saying you do not take credit in the post as there was no need to delete the post and remake them as your own. Thanks.



There is no reason why a chardev should be deleted.
 
Exactly, so why did you delete the post in the first place, and not give credit?



The post that was there was created around 2-3 days ago and had nothing to do with my actions that happened last night.
 
Chucktatorship!



But seriously, that BiS is an opinionated BiS, with zero sims done to prove that it, in fact, is BiS. If it's no longer his opinion (because the post was removed) then why keep it?



Why delete it ? If it can be usefull to someone there is no reason on why it should be removed.







Thanks, added. Who do i give credit?



Lunsh.
 
You removed the opinion, or the useful post in the first place. That's the reason. If the intent was to keep the useful information, the post would still be there.



You perhaps haven't read my replies above, ill quote it for you.



Both yours and your friend's posts where completely wiped, every single one done in the previous hours. This was the only way to save it.



Is it clever now and is the fact that i did not delete them enoght proven ?
 
You perhaps haven't read my replies above, ill quote it for you.







Is it clever now and is the fact that i did not delete them enoght proven ?

Well, was it the only way to save it? I'm not sure I think it is. Besides, it's fairly easy to check the first "troll" post that Magnerz made and delete it and everything after that time, wouldn't have affected anything at all, lest of all this.
 
Well, was it the only way to save it? I'm not sure I think it is. Besides, it's fairly easy to check the first "troll" post that Magnerz made and delete it and everything after that time, wouldn't have affected anything at all, lest of all this.



You are in fact not aware on how it works, i will say it a last time in the most easy way possible, every single post done in the previous hours was deleted, there was therefore no other way to prevent the post from being removed if not saving it and re-posting it under a different username which is exactly what i did to safeguard it, now, if this does not " convince " you you can feel free to contact any Moderator or any Administrator. ( or to message me )



Any further off topic post will be deleted, let's get this back to the initial and on topic subject.
 
Obviously this is off-topic and I'm guessing that commenting on moderator action is frowned upon, so if you want to go ahead and delete this post once you (and Kore) have read it then I'll stay quiet about it from then onwards.



Yes, discussion of disciplinary actions is not generally accepted but in this case I think it is to the benefit of the community to be relatively transparent.



Let me start by saying that neither member was permanently banned, they were indefinitely banned which is different in that it means that they have the chance to appeal. I have privately contacted both of them by email inviting them to appeal the ban if they wish. The fact that neither have replied and that both of them attempted to circumvent their ban did not help their case however. They can still contact me if they wish however.



Both members created threads (be advised that you may not be aware of all the posts/threads since non staff cannot view deleted or unapproved posts) that fall well into the category of spam by the CoC and were designed to be antagonistic, they both also replied to and exacerbated the situation through spam and insultive posts. The members actions were not equal and the actions of Magnerz were less acceptable than those of Lunsh. Neither were acceptable however.



It is obviously a matter of opinion as to what is a "fun" post and what is damaging to the forum, however due to the nature of many of the posts (strictly negative) the rest all take on that tone to a reader which makes the whole lot negative. If the two offending members were interested in just having a fun time then we have The Tavern, the PM system and member profile feed for the to use to that effect. A bracket forum is not the place for it.



They were given the severity of the ban however because of the repeated nature of the offences, complete lack of respect for the forum and their unwillingness to stop when issued a cease and desist order. They deliberately went out of their way to negatively affect the forums and to force a site officer to have to spend large amounts of time following hem around with a mop to clean up after them before I arrived on the scene.



I soft deleted all of their posts because the magnitude of the spam was prohibitively high for it to be fair for me to ask any staff member (who does this voluntarily I might add) to manually sift through the posts to deem which are appropriate and which aren't, especially at 1:30 am. (GMT at least). The reposted post was reposted because it was destined to be wiped anyway since the rest of the posts were about to be mass deleted. In hind sight I could have simply undeleted it after mass soft deletion, but as I mentioned it was 1:30 am and for whatever reason it didn't occur to me at the time.



The second issue I wanted to raise was just about the general moderation of this section. It feels like all the flaming and insults are tolerated here, that is until it the "Community Leader" comes into the line of fire. I'm referring mainly to the poster who got banned last night in the UI thread



This is a completely different issue. The member in question had the worst ban history on the site and was on his final final warning.



As the creator of the post, may i ask that you delete the entire post as i beleive that it should no longer be here, or at least give credit instead of saying you do not take credit in the post as there was no need to delete the post and remake them as your own. Thanks.



I will not be removing it since it is valuable information freely shared on the forum. Anything you post on the forums you agree to allow us to show indefinitely at our discretion. That doesn't mean we're nazi's about it, but it kinda defeats the point of the forum if we allow info to be removed. I will however now undelete your original post and remove the reposted content.









I think that's all the items covered, but it's entirely possible that I skimmed over a point or two. If I did just point then it out.
 
man i stay off TI for one day and i miss this....never again
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Top