Cant tell....

Gametime743

Legend
    • warrior: Dual Wield Specialization no longer increases Physical damage by 5%. It continues to increase off-hand attack damage by 25%.

    hunter: Explosive Shot damage has been increased by 15%. Animal Handler now increases Attack Power by 30%
     
    If they need to buff hunters at high levels, then those god damned retarded devs should put it in their talents.
     
    Ret is also getting a buff. Ret and hunters of all specs are clearly under powered and you OP warriors have been... Oh wait, nevermind. Blizz, business as usual. No one is surprised people don't want to pay for this game, and for the first time in WoW's history it is losing subscribers.
     
    Hardc0re said:
    Because Bliizard makes the balancing thinking in the F2P Players
    Click to expand...



    ^^

    Blizz isn't patching for F2P lol at 85 all these patches are pretty good really
    <




    ESPECIALLY THE SHAMAN ONES, wewt.
     
    holy shit guys, i know this is tough to wrap your heads around, but what pvp is like at level 20 has absolutely nothing to do with the people who actually pay money to play world of warcraft
     
    they can easily make these changes exclusively at high level though. It is the fact that they choose not to do this that creates the mad.
     
    muchies said:
    they can easily make these changes exclusively at high level though. It is the fact that they choose not to do this that creates the mad.
    Click to expand...



    More incentive for us to start paying
    <




    Blizz wants your money not your love
    <
     
    muchies said:
    You don't pay in the hopes they will improve the product. It really ought to be the other way around.
    Click to expand...



    lol your not paying in the hopes they will improve the product.



    All these updates are useful at 85



    What blizz has cleverly done is make life harder for F2P and easier for 85s. Brilliant really
    <
    demonstrating that paying for the game in fact DOES yield a better experience.
     
    You're not "not paying" so blizzard will improve the product, you're playing because it's free, new and FOTM. Anyone who thinks otherwise is an idiot and lying to themselves.



    Blizzard doesn't want warriors pvping as fury (or believe they should pvp as arms because arena said so) hence the nerfs every patch.



    Hunters have been broken since the resource changed to focus, hence the buffs every patch.



    Ret was broken before they added in Holy Power and said they were removing RNG from talents. Instead they took every RNG talent in the game and put it in retribution and told paladins they couldn't use their main damaging spells unless they put up with 10 second ramp up time. Then they removed their ability to AoE, made them off-healers while designing raid content to never need it and promised to buff them.
     
    Jdoring said:
    Warriors are in good shape at 85 when it comes to PvP, hunters needed that buff, i dont beleive ret did though, their burst is retarded
    Click to expand...

    Actually: No. Do you play 85? Warriors are like a broken version of DKs. Nothing is truly viable for a warrior in 3s atm at 85. I kind of quit my warrior due to this, being kited in endless amounts of CCs for 5 minutes until the other team has 3v2'd your team mates is not fun. And yes, I have a DK. Made one after warriors got buttf**ked, and by god it's a lot more powerful and the utility is way better than warriors. Actually just being on a target is <3.



    C O T U S said:
    holy shit guys, i know this is tough to wrap your heads around, but what pvp is like at level 20 has absolutely nothing to do with the people who actually pay money to play world of warcraft
    Click to expand...

    And your argument is invalid since this has nothing to do with paying for wow or not. You realise that any balance buffs made to the 20 bracket would inevitably benefit the 19 bracket as well due to them being as close as they are. Last I checked, 19 P2P twinks payed for wow, and have done so for many years, some up to 7... (Me included). Invalid argument is invalid.



    Best regards,
     
    Linden, idk how to quote part of your post on my phone so yea... But anyways, in threes I dont bother with trying to be the one that dishes out the damage anyways, warriors from my pov are the ones that do the peeling... Im sure most will agree, and warriors have some sick consistent damage, and a number of great "oh shit" buttons that make them like i said in good shape, that doesnt mean they are OP, but they arent UP either, although when it comes to 2v2 life sucks as a warrior, I will agree on that much..
     
    You must log in or register to reply here.

    Users who are viewing this thread

    Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
    Top