Will you play veteran accounts or still play on a "pure" f2p?

How will you be playing?

  • On a "Pure F2P"

    Votes: 25 33.8%
  • With linked guild heirlooms but no enchants or proffs.

    Votes: 14 18.9%
  • Full blown veteran with enchants and proffs.

    Votes: 17 23.0%
  • Veteran with a "F2p" set and a "B2p" set depending on situation

    Votes: 18 24.3%

  • Total voters
    74
We should make a new specific twinking group, called "Veteran Account Twinking" and it will be seperated from 20-29 just like "F2P Twinking". Problem solved.

The content in such a forum would overlap so heavily with that already found in "F2P" that it would be largely redundant and purposeless. I've initiated a conversation among the staff about how we want to handle this, and ultimately Shane will decide. My argument is for a re-labeling that doesn't include the term "F2P" at all. But as Mesikammen said, this is all only slightly related to the topic, and there isn't much purpose in rehashing the argument.
 
Pretty sure we're all classified as vet accounts atm. Or does a month of game time magically turn your trial account into a veteran account?
 
Pretty sure we're all classified as vet accounts atm. Or does a month of game time magically turn your trial account into a veteran account?

upgrading your account and then letting your sub run out makes you are veteran account. Or stop paying on ur p2p acc and then thats a vet acc.
 
Pretty sure we're all classified as vet accounts atm. Or does a month of game time magically turn your trial account into a veteran account?

Technically, Blizz refer to all of them as starter editions under account status on the Battle.net page, but for us, vet is a previously full account that has no current game time, and trial as F2P. Blizz also use the word trial when they prevent you from creating a DK, except on Moon Guard, where they magically let you level and go to Goldshire for RP DK fun.
 
So are starter edition(trial) accounts still an account classification under Blizzard's standards? Or are we just making a stupid distinction between veteran and "starter edition" accounts via a past sub fee for purity's sake?
 
Everyone should just make overpowered vet classes.
It's obviously the right thing to do now
 
So are starter edition(trial) accounts still an account classification under Blizzard's standards? Or are we just making a stupid distinction between veteran and "starter edition" accounts via a past sub fee for purity's sake?

Yes, there are differences. Apart from being able to use enchants, level profs and gain extra BoAs, vets can join guilds, including when their game time has expired, and currently, F2P have access to the Battle.net friends list, while vet accounts do not. If you log into the website there are obvious differences too.
 
Yes, there are differences. Apart from being able to use enchants, level profs and gain extra BoAs, vets can join guilds, including when their game time has expired, and currently, F2P have access to the Battle.net friends list, while vet accounts do not. If you log into the website there are obvious differences too.
mkay tyty
 
its basically 2 answer pure f2p & veteran with 3 answers . currently its

Pure f2p - 16

Veterans - 28


Welcome to the Dark Side. We lied about the Cookies.


Even The Moon Has A DarkSide


 
Last edited by a moderator:
I went vet. If you can, you should too.
Btw its alot easier process if you have a 90+ character to help get any looms you don't already have and chants.
 
Doesn't matter.. In the end we all go up against each other...

But yes I'm still pure f2p (how did this pure/linked thing start?)
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top