Exo Spam Prot vs Holy?

Bracketeer

Legend
Sup guys. Been talking to other paladins 'round Aggramar and all across the interwebs. I've been hearing that Exo Spam prot is becoming more viable as time goes on, and i would like some verification.

-Exo Prot-
Tankier (Can FC)
Silence that is crucial
Generally more HP
Less mana
Less Heals
Seems Fun to try.

-Standard Holy-
Great heals
Generally Squishier
Mana not a problem really.
Cannot FC
Does considerably more damage, though no form of CC or interrupt other than HoJ.

So, at this point, which is more popular / which is more viable? Share ideas.
 
I'm curious why holy cannot FC?
 
With both holy and prot in a BG I'd probably have prot FC and holy run support, but solo I'd prefer holy since 4.3.
 
Exactly pug wise holy FC more viable you need a good hybrid set and when there is a good FC in a pug game , just swap back to full holy set. But of course if he's a good holy pally , not just anyone can run holy FC.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top