Do you think Ret should be able to use Crusader in the 2v2 tourney?

Should Ret have Crusader?

  • Total voters
    36
Ya sure unless it wins the tourney the u gotta ban it xD
 
Ret without sader is a little weak and ret with sader seems a little strong. I'd let them have like landslide or better yet, berserking. Proc @19 is 56 ap and minus 5% armor
 
Edwaaardo said:
Ret without sader is a little weak and ret with sader seems a little strong. I'd let them have like landslide or better yet, berserking. Proc @19 is 56 ap and minus 5% armor
Click to expand...

Yeah I had been thinking of making it landslide, but I had some suggestions of running berseking too.
 
Saxxon said:
Ya sure unless it wins the tourney the u gotta ban it xD
Click to expand...

you won the last arena tourney therefore you should be banned from this one
 
Flamer said:
you won the last arena tourney therefore you should be banned from this one
Click to expand...

So true. I'm tired of people complaining about the winning comp each tournament. Whatever wins just didn't play their counter, or they're the better team. I think the rules are pretty fair as they stand now, and I don't see them being changed again, not without my prior approval anyways, and I don't see anything wrong with them.
 
I just want the people's thought on this rule, because it is very controversial. So far the majority is in favor of letting Ret use Crusader.
 
Delayed said:
How so? They don't have any slows though, nor mortal strike healing debuff.
Click to expand...

I meant more damage wise.. ret's do the same amount of dmg as warriors with sader proc and wings so im not sure the logic behind banning warriors from using it and not rets.
 
Baked said:
I meant more damage wise.. ret's do the same amount of dmg as warriors with sader proc and wings so im not sure the logic behind banning warriors from using it and not rets.
Click to expand...

I agree here. But I'm not saying in in favor of allowing it. We're gonna try it this week and see what happens. It will never be allowed for warriors, I'm in favor of banning all chance on proc shit. If rets get sader then warriors get it. Then brews get LS and none of us want that.
Side note: are you the holy pally Baked I played 24s with all the time?
 
Jamesb said:
I agree here. But I'm not saying in in favor of allowing it. We're gonna try it this week and see what happens. It will never be allowed for warriors, I'm in favor of banning all chance on proc shit. If rets get sader then warriors get it. Then brews get LS and none of us want that.
Side note: are you the holy pally Baked I played 24s with all the time?
Click to expand...

Just ban weapon enchants in general i swear to god it will be 100x better. Also nah i hate 24's only played it a couple times back in the day before headbutting a knife and never logging on it again.
 
Baked said:
Just ban weapon enchants in general i swear to god it will be 100x better. Also nah i hate 24's only played it a couple times back in the day before headbutting a knife and never logging on it again.
Click to expand...

That's not a bad idea but EF and AP arnt bad to have either.
Ah, well there was an Hpal named Baked that was really good figured it may have been you since I see you healing so often.
 
i clicked this thread from the main TI page not knowing whether it was for level 19 or 29

i play ret in both, as far as 19 i should say ''played'' cuz been inactive for months on the 19 ret, but the class is no different @ 19 right now than it was when i was playing it every day in arena.

19 ret is not a good class if it doesn't get its AP/str steroid proc going to make it on the level of ''scaryness'' of a feral/rogue/warr, and even then its in a very different kind of way... without that proc, the class revolves entirely around HoJ and living till the next hoj into healer with trinket down, to get the win then...

obviously this is very irritating, being not a skillful way or fun way to get a win either... its obvious for any team who knows they're about to recieve 2nd hoj that they cant trinket, that they lose, and not for skill reasons..

29 ret is totally diff, im 100% for crusader being banned @ that level because at least ret is good without it there, at 19, ret is NOT good without the huge str modifier proc

edit: landslide could work/supplement, but its so bad rng that alot of rets will go many many games without a proc (if there even is any, cuz sader ban will weed out tons)

as anyone who has played them knows, wet noodle style when sader isn't up. If its banned, no one should even run a comp w/ ret for it, imho
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Jamesb said:
That's not a bad idea but EF and AP arnt bad to have either.
Ah, well there was an Hpal named Baked that was really good figured it may have been you since I see you healing so often.
Click to expand...

EF and AP are fine if everyone ran those it would be alot more balanced and enjoyable. Ah okay nah man wasn't me but thanks for the kind words ;)
 
Baked said:
EF and AP are fine if everyone ran those it would be alot more balanced and enjoyable. Ah okay nah man wasn't me but thanks for the kind words ;)
Click to expand...

Sure man. Hey if you have horde toons and are ever down for some arenas, or 29 alliance for the same thing feel free to hmu Byebyewifi#1531.
Also I usually do the brackets etc for the 2s on Saturday so if you wanna compete wouldn't hurt either.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 3 (members: 0, guests: 3)
Top