@Myrm

(Hass)

(Hass)

Wizard of the ramp
Would you be down to host all gms/guild representatives in a skype call/curse call to answer any and all questions pertaining to the rules and issues that might arise in the twink cup?

I think this would be easier and a one last look over so EVERYONE has a clear understanding going forward. If we are proactive instead of reactive, I feel as the TC will run much much much smoother.
 
I'd love for this to happen. A meeting between Myrm, HB, Sudo, Mutando, Vanillamilk, Tapout, and myself.
 
Pizza said:
I'd love for this to happen. A meeting between Myrm, HB, Sudo, Mutando, Vanillamilk, Tapout, and myself.
Click to expand...

yeah. there's a lot of things I'd still like to ask/confirm concerning rules and a few other things, and speaking with the other GMs (I'd be there on behalf of jcm) is the easiest way to sort things out.

I don't want to run into any situations with people "accidentally" cheating or whatever.
 
Pizza said:
I'd love for this to happen. A meeting between Myrm, HB, Sudo, Mutando, Vanillamilk, Tapout, and myself.
Click to expand...

Aren't there nine (9) seeds for the cup? Or am I misreading the wsg seed list?
 
Mods? @ threads are against the toc
 
Interesting historical note, from a purely academic standpoint there was never a rule in the CoC (that I can recall) explicitly forbidding @threads. It always feel under some other category. In the current iteration of the CoC (which I wrote, hrm hrm hrm) @threads would fall under toxic behavior, and then only if they were toxic. This thread is not toxic so let's all just relax a wee bit.

Having said all that, seriously you could have just PM'ed him. But that's none of my business.
 
Kincaide said:
Interesting historical note, from a purely academic standpoint there was never a rule in the CoC (that I can recall) explicitly forbidding @threads. It always feel under some other category. In the current iteration of the CoC (which I wrote, hrm hrm hrm) @threads would fall under toxic behavior, and then only if they were toxic. This thread is not toxic so let's all just relax a wee bit.

Having said all that, seriously you could have just PM'ed him. But that's none of my business.
Click to expand...
So keep it moving soldier.
 
Guys after I became a mod the 19s section became more relaxed with @ threads, myrm has no official stance on it but the mods are less likely to close threads, give infractions, or bans than ever before, that doesn't mean it can't happen, but if you make an @ thread just make it productive like this one and don't cross any obvious lines. Also Curse would be a better option than skype.
 
Last edited:
Kincaide said:
Interesting historical note, from a purely academic standpoint there was never a rule in the CoC (that I can recall) explicitly forbidding @threads. It always feel under some other category. In the current iteration of the CoC (which I wrote, hrm hrm hrm) @threads would fall under toxic behavior, and then only if they were toxic. This thread is not toxic so let's all just relax a wee bit.

Having said all that, seriously you could have just PM'ed him. But that's none of my business.
Click to expand...

I wanted to make it public so that more people would be allowed to "get on board" with the idea. Also I'm really only just doing this so I could potentially get more likes.. trying to catch up to dory isn't easy you know.
 
anatomyx said:
I don't want to run into any situations with people "accidentally" cheating or whatever.
Click to expand...

"oops sorry mate, I didnt know Swatting would get me banned from the Cup, heres $2k can I still play?"
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Top