EU+US Corruption below 120

If your doing this with xp on, wouldnt eventually you cap and hit 120? I only ask many questions since i have 2 toons with 388 gear
Yes, but you only get like 1-2% exp per win, even less without the 100% bonus exp going on. It works out pretty well, especially if you have many twinks.
 
I turned on my xp for my warrior thats a 119 twink and he got over half a level in xp and it was just a eyes of the storm. No gear and pretty sure if I do 1 more, it will be 120
 
After reaching out anything that isn't 120 ilvl shouldn't be allowed to get corruption. That is just what I was told though.

I gave up on this expansion though, see you in Shadowlands.
 
I turned on my xp for my warrior thats a 119 twink and he got over half a level in xp and it was just a eyes of the storm. No gear and pretty sure if I do 1 more, it will be 120
with the double experience bonus and your rested experience im sure it wouldn’t take more than a handful of games to level. im using the debuff a xp on player gets when grouped and inside an instance with a xp locked toon. once you leave the group a 5 min timer starts. you need to que for the bg and keep that xp debuff active the entire time you’re in que and once in the bg. it resets to 5 minutes each time you get in combat or take damage from a npc or player. i use either rfc or stockades to get then keep the buff active. you can let the low level mobs beat on you to keep it at 5 mins. enjoy!
[doublepost=1593372799,1593372611][/doublepost]
After reaching out anything that isn't 120 ilvl shouldn't be allowed to get corruption. That is just what I was told though.

I gave up on this expansion though, see you in Shadowlands.
its my opinion this is how corruption should work at end game. no resistance to the negative effects means its truly a risk/reward system. its hurt me more times than its helped believe me.
 
its my opinion this is how corruption should work at end game. no resistance to the negative effects means its truly a risk/reward system. its hurt me more times than its helped believe me.

I like ya' so I can get behind this.
 
Got a piece from skrims
upload_2020-7-18_11-38-25.png
 
I believe I saw that somewhere on wowhead.
https://www.wowhead.com/news=316854/corruption-will-be-removed-in-the-shadowlands-prepatch
"This can be confirmed by looking at items within our database, as MOTHER's preserved corruptions such as Preserved Contaminant: Gushing Wound have all become unusable Spoiled Contaminant."
https://shadowlands.wowhead.com/item=177977/spoiled-contaminant

suxs, I thought I read sumwhere that they just got red in shadowlands areas but we could still use them else where.
 
https://www.wowhead.com/news=316854/corruption-will-be-removed-in-the-shadowlands-prepatch
"This can be confirmed by looking at items within our database, as MOTHER's preserved corruptions such as Preserved Contaminant: Gushing Wound have all become unusable Spoiled Contaminant."
https://shadowlands.wowhead.com/item=177977/spoiled-contaminant

suxs, I thought I read sumwhere that they just got red in shadowlands areas but we could still use them else where.
I believe you can still use like the traits from gear in SL just not in SL zones. That’s prolly what you read.
 
Holy crap I wish this had a socket lol
dropped from a world supply chest
View attachment 16007
Racing pulse corruption is probably really good for some specs. Ray of frost 1shot etc. def seems like a stat proc or twilight dev is the way to go under 120
[doublepost=1595368991,1595368820][/doublepost]
Racing pulse corruption is probably really good for some specs. Ray of frost 1shot etc. def seems like a stat proc or twilight dev is the way to go under 120
I’m very curious if you could loot it from a world supply drop at 110-111
 
I’m very curious if you could loot it from a world supply drop at 110-111

I don't think I've seen a single report of anyone looting corrupted items in any shape or form below 116. I've probably averaged 1.5 chests (Secret + War Supply) per day since 8.3 hit and I've seen 0 (admittedly anecdotal evidence, though).
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top