5G - Acquiring Information about its negative health impacts!!!!

Status
Not open for further replies.

Livingforce

Member
Hi Everyone,

I'm in need of help of sourcing any factual information regarding the negative impacts of 5G.

Its a major concern for everyone in the world and needs to be looked at very seriously.

This needs to stop, until extensive testing has been performed on the technology and how it has been laid out around the world.

It would mean allot of you guys have anything of use that you would like to share <3
 
what do you mean negative impact ? there are many things that has negative impact but pple still do it .. when 4G was out, scientists came together to report on the negative impact, under prolong exposure, 4G has cause tumor growth in adult rats, what did the telcom pple say? they say humans aint rat, so it doesnt apply to humans and they went ahead with 4G, you know pple got to find excuse to convince others whether something is harmful or not, the premise that 4G went ahead was that they believe that these technologies comply with ICNIRP non-ionising standards, my question at that time was if it does then why do rats get tumor, my friends argued that the rats were under almost constant nonstop bombardment of the waves during testing and we humans do not use our phone this way, for me, the FACT that it cause tumor IS already a proof that it aint that safe, but what the heck, people smoke even though they know its "negative", so what if you know something is negative .. and if you are so worried, you prob shouldnt even talk on a phone with a bluetooth headset or a earphone, becoz the distance between the earphones to the brain is very short .. in the end, it may hurt some people more than others and every human have a different threshold, and this is just 4G .. now 5G .. thats many many many many times stronger .. anyway, even if there are no 4G or 5G .. there are still many other waves around us .. 5G will proceed regardless whether they have negative impact or not
 
Yall need to learn the difference between ionizing radiation and radio waves lol.

Like there's tons of reasons why Huawei should be banned, the obvious being their tech spying on us by the Chinese gov. This propaganda pseudo-science is just going to stifle us in the future for a short benefit of keeping Huawei out.

Study of people who have been exposed to RF at their workplace.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1253668/

Radio waves do not effect people. It needs to be on the other side of the spectrum and be ionizing radiation strength to do harm.
This is not true for rats and no one knows why.
 
Last edited:
you dont need 5G to spy .. some nation was caught red handed listening in on Merkel's personal phone and it sure aint the chinese .. i dont even need to name which country and everyone knows it .. the irony is that dumb fk is the one going around accusing everyone else of spying lolol

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news...n-chancellery-decades-wikileaks-claims-merkel

https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-24627187

i .. errrm .. do not know what NSA means .. but i can guess its some country's dumb fk agency
 
Last edited:
5G has been used in the military on a more powerful level than the 5G network to scatter crowds as our human brains functions on frequency just like 5G (This is fact, and has been admitted by the military, do some homework). It made victims feel like their skin was burning when it wasn't. 5G (like many things we have in this world) supports the growth of cancer. They've already put up 5G systems where I live, usually found on top of buildings in cities/towns, with white circular and rectangular technology and it looks fucked up, with the amount of gear they need to implement it. They pay the installers an insane amount of money to install them, why? Because it exposes them to the strong, direct frequency of 5G that will indefinitely do no good to them. We're not going to stop them from implementing 5G, it's already too late. They've been complaining about overpopulation for many years now, and this is just 1 other way of them being able to manage that "issue". Years ago, people never used to get cancer as much as now. Look at the statistics, cancer is a rising threat to everybody, progressively. Personally I believe there's so much space on this earth for people, but ofc with there being only so few 1st world countries compared to how many countries there actually are, people dream of living in the 1st world countries. Best get your asses away from civilization and live remote, off-grid. The worlds going down the shitter due to powerhungry trash, and we all know it.
 
Jesus, people not knowing the difference between radio waves and radiation. This is pathetic. "Hey my evidence is that a lot of ppl got cancer when they had PHONES with 5G!!" okay bud, that doesn't prove a causation at all.
 
Once I'm 40 you can throw me in the trash anyways, cancer is irrelevant
 
5G has been used in the military on a more powerful level than the 5G network to scatter crowds as our human brains functions on frequency just like 5G (This is fact, and has been admitted by the military, do some homework). It made victims feel like their skin was burning when it wasn't. 5G (like many things we have in this world) supports the growth of cancer. They've already put up 5G systems where I live, usually found on top of buildings in cities/towns, with white circular and rectangular technology and it looks fucked up, with the amount of gear they need to implement it. They pay the installers an insane amount of money to install them, why? Because it exposes them to the strong, direct frequency of 5G that will indefinitely do no good to them. We're not going to stop them from implementing 5G, it's already too late. They've been complaining about overpopulation for many years now, and this is just 1 other way of them being able to manage that "issue". Years ago, people never used to get cancer as much as now. Look at the statistics, cancer is a rising threat to everybody, progressively. Personally I believe there's so much space on this earth for people, but ofc with there being only so few 1st world countries compared to how many countries there actually are, people dream of living in the 1st world countries. Best get your asses away from civilization and live remote, off-grid. The worlds going down the shitter due to powerhungry trash, and we all know it.

So many untrue things are said in this paragraph. I'm only responding to this so readers won't believe your bullshit. I'm not trying to change your mind, as you are already lost to irrationality.

5G has been used in the military on a more powerful level than the 5G network to scatter crowds as our human brains functions on frequency just like 5G (This is fact, and has been admitted by the military, do some homework). It made victims feel like their skin was burning when it wasn't.

5G does not cause victims skin to burn. The military has not used 5G. They have a weapon called Active Denial System, which works by firing a high-powered beam of a 3.2 mm wavelength of 95 GHz. 5G uses 1 mm wavelength, which has been used since the dawn of fucking time with radars. And the wavelengths only contain 28 GHz. To put this into perspective, microwaves are extremely dangerous and do MORE DAMAGE than the Active Denial System, but the GHz is lower. Why? Because the wavelengths are LONGER. Microwaves have have wavelengths of 1 meter to 1 mm, depending on the heat that you want, and the GHz is the same as 4G. So first claim DEBUNKED.

5G (like many things we have in this world) supports the growth of cancer. They've already put up 5G systems where I live, usually found on top of buildings in cities/towns, with white circular and rectangular technology and it looks fucked up, with the amount of gear they need to implement it. They pay the installers an insane amount of money to install them, why? Because it exposes them to the strong, direct frequency of 5G that will indefinitely do no good to them.


5G does not cause cancer. This study, which is widely referenced when experts talk about the topic of RF-EMR, proves that even an extremely long wavelength, with a high GHz STILL does not cause cancer. On top of that, rats are more vulnerable to these wavelengths due to their smaller size and still it didn't cause cancer. So second claim DEBUNKED.


They've been complaining about overpopulation for many years now, and this is just 1 other way of them being able to manage that "issue".

Overpopulation is not an issue, anyone who reads credible studies and not watch youtube videos of their favorite conservative youtuber, would know that overpopulation is not an issue. Every credible study on overpopulation shows that population growth is slowing down, and that by 2100 the population "boom" will stop. If you have low attention-span, then watch this Kurzgesagt video on overpopulation. They use the study I referenced to make the video, and are essentially quoting the study throughout with visuals.
And heres the study:
https://ourworldindata.org/world-population-growth#when-will-the-world-population-stop-growing
So third claim DEBUNKED.

Years ago, people never used to get cancer as much as now. Look at the statistics, cancer is a rising threat to everybody, progressively.

False, new cases of cancer is decreasing and deaths from cancer is decreasing. So fourth claim DEBUNKED.
https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/all.html


And my message directly to you @Asiyx please don't form opinions that are this strong without reading studies. The youtubers and memers you get your opinions from may not be credible, as there is a lot of youtubers and memers who make human errors with their videos, such as confirmation bias, selective bias and irrationality.
[doublepost=1561220704,1561220570][/doublepost]
what do you mean negative impact ? there are many things that has negative impact but pple still do it .. when 4G was out, scientists came together to report on the negative impact, under prolong exposure, 4G has cause tumor growth in adult rats, what did the telcom pple say? they say humans aint rat, so it doesnt apply to humans and they went ahead with 4G, you know pple got to find excuse to convince others whether something is harmful or not, the premise that 4G went ahead was that they believe that these technologies comply with ICNIRP non-ionising standards, my question at that time was if it does then why do rats get tumor, my friends argued that the rats were under almost constant nonstop bombardment of the waves during testing and we humans do not use our phone this way, for me, the FACT that it cause tumor IS already a proof that it aint that safe, but what the heck, people smoke even though they know its "negative", so what if you know something is negative .. and if you are so worried, you prob shouldnt even talk on a phone with a bluetooth headset or a earphone, becoz the distance between the earphones to the brain is very short .. in the end, it may hurt some people more than others and every human have a different threshold, and this is just 4G .. now 5G .. thats many many many many times stronger .. anyway, even if there are no 4G or 5G .. there are still many other waves around us .. 5G will proceed regardless whether they have negative impact or not

Read what I wrote above, it'll debunk everything you just said.
 
Imagine if people cared as much about climate change, a real problem, as this

What a world that would be

gg twinks
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Top