the true math behind the twink cup

marblea

Legend
so i recently found out that only 1v1s matter

in math you can simplify numbers to get easier numbers to use

so in wow you can divide 10v10 or 3v3 or 5v5 or whatever by itself leaving 1v1.

this is HUGE information for the twink cup it means we can just have 1v1s which would be a lot easier to organize and the winner will receive a bigger prizepool

PS: all my reasoning is extreamly accurate so no need to look over it and correct it
 
I have confirmed this mathematics, this is the true way to determine the winner of the twink cup.
 
Wow, You can divide.
 
I thought coordinated teamplay and good communication was key to victory?

i thought so too but the math shows otherwise
 
If you ask me we should just do /roll this way no one even has to play
 
This. RNG is what it takes to win a 1v1 as long as there aren't class advantages. So if we all make level 1 warriors with no boas all on the same realm and just /roll against each other we can determine the winner there.

Testing hasn't been done however to see if cosmetic choices on the character creation screen affect /roll numbers. We can't be sure it will be fair.
 
rip homes and dreams of possibly winning the tournament
He may have been overwhelmingly demolished by Deadlymidget in the Gulch, but myth be told, Curley had defeated him numerous times in the sewers of Dalaran.

Pizza (not the entire guild), has invested Curley with this honorable task and is sure he will not let us down.
 
Tell me again how a 1v1 makes the prize pool magically larger.
This must be the new math that is being taught in school.

/cheers
 
I win in a team of 10 I get $600

I win in a team of 1 I get $6000

ez

The prizePOOL did not increase. The end result is still 6,000. That is unless you have achieved a perpetual motion machine. And if you have I doubt you be needing $6,000.
/cheers
 
The prizePOOL did not increase. The end result is still 6,000. That is unless you have achieved a perpetual motion machine. And if you have I doubt you be needing $6,000.
/cheers

I'm sure most can interpret the intention of the post anyway, however I believe he would have worded it better by saying SHARE of the prizepool is bigger.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top