EU+US [Updated] Armory List

Last edited:
Winterly said:
Any chance 102s and 109s will be on this? (I've been having a blast making my 109 fury warrior for ipvp)
Click to expand...
Listen to him, @Changzu. Read these wise words. Got it, @Changzu? Good. ;-)

@Winterly Arms and Fury are really strong atm in ipvp, don't wanna know what a fully geared 109 is capable of doing. Same goes for guardian tbh. Had a blast at 99 and now i'm leveling a new one for 109. Spreading AoE Bleeds and Moonfire is too much fun. :p
 
Winterly said:
Any chance 102s and 109s will be on this? (I've been having a blast making my 109 fury warrior for ipvp)
Click to expand...
MyPerfection said:
Listen to him, @Changzu. Read these wise words. Got it, @Changzu? Good. ;-)
Click to expand...
102's are listed for DH's, i'll update it to all classes. However 109's are not going to be listed because that's just not a twink, they use the same gear as 101's apart from a few items, and they aren't as good, not even close to a 101 therefore i see no reason to list them.
 
Changzu said:
However 109's are not going to be listed because that's just not a twink, they use the same gear as 101's apart from a few items, and they aren't as good, not even close to a 101 therefore i see no reason to list them.
Click to expand...
Those are iPVP twinks.
 
MyPerfection said:
Those are iPVP twinks.
Click to expand...
I know, I get that. But the amount of 109 "twinks" are really small. On this community there's like 3 109 twinks, if the demand was bigger I would consider it, but for now i'm going to leave them out.
 
Changzu said:
I know, I get that. But the amount of 109 "twinks" are really small. On this community there's like 3 109 twinks, if the demand was bigger I would consider it, but for now i'm going to leave them out.
Click to expand...
That's fine. It's already a lot of work what you are doing by keeping the values up to date.
 
Just my personal opinion here but I don't understand why someone would put a load of gold into a 109 twink. Why limit yourself to only ipvp when at 101/102 you also get the choice of pve/wpvp with very little loss in ipvp?

Do 109s even gain much over 101s in ipvp now that the 810 relics exist? Surely multi-armor classes have every slot filled with the same BoE's.
 
Aelobin said:
Just my personal opinion here but I don't understand why someone would put a load of gold into a 109 twink. Why limit yourself to only ipvp when at 101/102 you also get the choice of pve/wpvp with very little loss in ipvp?

Do 109s even gain much over 101s in ipvp now that the 810 relics exist? Surely multi-armor classes have every slot filled with the same BoE's.
Click to expand...
Can't multi armor in bgs. You'll lose the 5% stat or whatever.
 
Aelobin said:
Just my personal opinion here but I don't understand why someone would put a load of gold into a 109 twink. Why limit yourself to only ipvp when at 101/102 you also get the choice of pve/wpvp with very little loss in ipvp?
Click to expand...
Hey, PVEer. There are people out there who enjoy ipvp and try to max that. :p

Aelobin said:
Do 109s even gain much over 101s in ipvp now that the 810 relics exist? Surely multi-armor classes have every slot filled with the same BoE's.
Click to expand...
You have to wear your armor class in ipvp or the stat template screws you over.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Top