Leverage
Legend
Allow me to say something else please.
Actually, I dont thing it was a good game. Lemme explain, another time we had clearly unbalanced teams and the result it was another time a one side match.
Im not complaining, actually I coulnd't care less about loss or win. I think wargames are supposed to be a way to have fun for that kind of players we are and for "that kind of player" I mean people that enjoy to have good challenge against a worthy opponent.
Actually, I do not think that horde was a worth opponent this time and Im disappointed of that not only for the horde (where I played) but also for the alliance that did't had much trouble against our clumsy team, I dont want to blame anyone. I think that for many players something like wargames its new and kinda complicated (I screwed myself too in the match).
However, i think that we can settle this with patience and time, its in the interest of everyone to have a balanced fight otherwise we can go back all in randoms facing 29s p2p premades
Im on the opinion that every time we set a wargames we find out what's wrong and we can work on it in order to improve the game. For sample we found out that we needs rules for ferals, bm monks etc....each time we play we find out what can makes the team balanced and for this reason I think we have just to keep going on this way.
As Pleya said, I was kinda surprised how people had the patience to wait so much time and just for 2 games. I do my apologize, I didnt expected to be on the coordination and I had really an hard time to contact, horde, alliance and people on skype. Said this, I could help with pelasure to organize the next match, just dont ask me that on the same day.
Well, I hope we can find a way to have funny battles between us (I dont really like the idea to go back in random bgs with ungeared jajas on my side
Greetings
Actually, I dont thing it was a good game. Lemme explain, another time we had clearly unbalanced teams and the result it was another time a one side match.
Im not complaining, actually I coulnd't care less about loss or win. I think wargames are supposed to be a way to have fun for that kind of players we are and for "that kind of player" I mean people that enjoy to have good challenge against a worthy opponent.
Actually, I do not think that horde was a worth opponent this time and Im disappointed of that not only for the horde (where I played) but also for the alliance that did't had much trouble against our clumsy team, I dont want to blame anyone. I think that for many players something like wargames its new and kinda complicated (I screwed myself too in the match).
However, i think that we can settle this with patience and time, its in the interest of everyone to have a balanced fight otherwise we can go back all in randoms facing 29s p2p premades
Im on the opinion that every time we set a wargames we find out what's wrong and we can work on it in order to improve the game. For sample we found out that we needs rules for ferals, bm monks etc....each time we play we find out what can makes the team balanced and for this reason I think we have just to keep going on this way.
As Pleya said, I was kinda surprised how people had the patience to wait so much time and just for 2 games. I do my apologize, I didnt expected to be on the coordination and I had really an hard time to contact, horde, alliance and people on skype. Said this, I could help with pelasure to organize the next match, just dont ask me that on the same day.
Well, I hope we can find a way to have funny battles between us (I dont really like the idea to go back in random bgs with ungeared jajas on my side
Greetings
Last edited by a moderator: